L5M5試験無料問題集「CIPS Managing Ethical Procurement and Supply (L5M5) 認定」
In an effort to enhance sustainability and ethical business practices, four companies have embedded Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance measures into their supplier agreements. Each organization has identified specific ESG challenges and established contractual requirements that suppliers must meet to align with corporate sustainability objectives.
Below is an overview of the ESG priorities for each company and the corresponding contractual terms:
Company 1:
This company has pledged to cut its carbon footprint by 40% by 2030. To achieve this target, it mandates that its suppliers actively contribute to emission reduction efforts. Suppliers are required to meet defined, measurable benchmarks related to carbon emissions and submit periodic reports detailing their progress on sustainability initiatives.
Company 2:
With a strong emphasis on fostering fairness and inclusivity, this company requires suppliers to align their payment structures and financial strategies with its commitment to equity. Suppliers must implement fair compensation policies, ensure timely salary disbursements via banking channels, and adopt ethical pricing structures that support inclusive hiring practices, particularly for underrepresented groups.
Company 3
Operating in industries prone to unethical practices, this company enforces stringent anti-corruption policies and financial transparency requirements for its suppliers. Suppliers must uphold rigorous governance standards, establish transparent reporting mechanisms, and comply with all anti-corruption regulations to ensure ethical business operations.
Company 4
This company is committed to making a meaningful impact on the communities in which its suppliers operate. As part of its contractual obligations, suppliers must actively participate in local initiatives that drive social and economic development. This includes contributing to community projects, generating employment opportunities, and supporting social welfare programs.
The four companies must establish contractual terms aligned with their respective ESG considerations, including a Community Benefit Clause, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), Commercial Clause, and Governance Clause.
Match Column A with Column B from the following table:

Below is an overview of the ESG priorities for each company and the corresponding contractual terms:
Company 1:
This company has pledged to cut its carbon footprint by 40% by 2030. To achieve this target, it mandates that its suppliers actively contribute to emission reduction efforts. Suppliers are required to meet defined, measurable benchmarks related to carbon emissions and submit periodic reports detailing their progress on sustainability initiatives.
Company 2:
With a strong emphasis on fostering fairness and inclusivity, this company requires suppliers to align their payment structures and financial strategies with its commitment to equity. Suppliers must implement fair compensation policies, ensure timely salary disbursements via banking channels, and adopt ethical pricing structures that support inclusive hiring practices, particularly for underrepresented groups.
Company 3
Operating in industries prone to unethical practices, this company enforces stringent anti-corruption policies and financial transparency requirements for its suppliers. Suppliers must uphold rigorous governance standards, establish transparent reporting mechanisms, and comply with all anti-corruption regulations to ensure ethical business operations.
Company 4
This company is committed to making a meaningful impact on the communities in which its suppliers operate. As part of its contractual obligations, suppliers must actively participate in local initiatives that drive social and economic development. This includes contributing to community projects, generating employment opportunities, and supporting social welfare programs.
The four companies must establish contractual terms aligned with their respective ESG considerations, including a Community Benefit Clause, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), Commercial Clause, and Governance Clause.
Match Column A with Column B from the following table:

正解:A,B
解答を投票する
解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)
An organization has a clear understanding of the service it requires and has precisely outlined the process for how the supplier must deliver it. It aims to use an 'outcome-focused specification.' Is this the appropriate specification approach for the organization?
正解:B
解答を投票する
解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)
Several UK-based companies operate in diverse production industries, each facing unique market structures and supplier dynamics when sourcing raw materials and negotiating contracts. The power balance between buyers and suppliers varies based on market conditions, supplier availability, and industry-specific factors.
Case A: GreenPasture Feeds Ltd
GreenPasture Feeds Ltd is one of many manufacturers producing cattle feed, with soybean meal as a key ingredient. However, the supply of soybean meal is controlled by a small number of vendors, giving them significant bargaining power. As a result, GreenPasture Feeds Ltd faces higher procurement costs due to supplier dominance in the market.
Case B: MedTech Biologics Ltd
MedTech Biologics Ltd develops a specialized vaccine that relies on a crucial active ingredient supplied by a single biotechnology firm in Germany. This exclusive dependency creates a strategic interdependence between MedTech Biologics Ltd and its sole supplier, requiring close collaboration to maintain an uninterrupted supply chain.
Case C: PlayMax Toy Manufacturing
PlayMax Toy Manufacturing produces plastic toys using a specialized food-grade plastic sourced from a few manufacturers. However, the plastic resin needed for production is widely available from numerous global suppliers. This abundance of supply options strengthens PlayMax's bargaining position, allowing the company to negotiate favorable procurement terms.
Case D: BrewMaster Coffee Company
BrewMaster Coffee Company specializes in premium instant coffee production. Since high-quality Arabica coffee beans are grown and supplied by producers across various regions worldwide, the company benefits from an extensive supplier base. This widespread availability gives BrewMaster a competitive edge in securing cost-effective and high-quality raw materials.
Using the provided options, complete the table by identifying the market structure for each case and determining the buyer-supplier power dynamic based on their level of dominance.

Case A: GreenPasture Feeds Ltd
GreenPasture Feeds Ltd is one of many manufacturers producing cattle feed, with soybean meal as a key ingredient. However, the supply of soybean meal is controlled by a small number of vendors, giving them significant bargaining power. As a result, GreenPasture Feeds Ltd faces higher procurement costs due to supplier dominance in the market.
Case B: MedTech Biologics Ltd
MedTech Biologics Ltd develops a specialized vaccine that relies on a crucial active ingredient supplied by a single biotechnology firm in Germany. This exclusive dependency creates a strategic interdependence between MedTech Biologics Ltd and its sole supplier, requiring close collaboration to maintain an uninterrupted supply chain.
Case C: PlayMax Toy Manufacturing
PlayMax Toy Manufacturing produces plastic toys using a specialized food-grade plastic sourced from a few manufacturers. However, the plastic resin needed for production is widely available from numerous global suppliers. This abundance of supply options strengthens PlayMax's bargaining position, allowing the company to negotiate favorable procurement terms.
Case D: BrewMaster Coffee Company
BrewMaster Coffee Company specializes in premium instant coffee production. Since high-quality Arabica coffee beans are grown and supplied by producers across various regions worldwide, the company benefits from an extensive supplier base. This widespread availability gives BrewMaster a competitive edge in securing cost-effective and high-quality raw materials.
Using the provided options, complete the table by identifying the market structure for each case and determining the buyer-supplier power dynamic based on their level of dominance.

正解:A,B
解答を投票する
解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)