H12-831_V1.0試験無料問題集「Huawei HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology V1.0 認定」

Explanation:
* A = 50
* B = 10
* C = 20
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
Understanding OSPF Path Selection and Cost Calculation:
* OSPF selects the shortest path (lowest cost) to the destination.
* The OSPF cost is determined by the cumulative sum of interface costs along a path.
* By assigning specific costs to A, B, and C, we can influence OSPF's path selection to meet the desired routing behavior.
Step-by-Step Analysis of Required Traffic Flow:
1. Traffic from PC1 to PC2 must take the route:
PC1 -> R1 -> R3 -> R2 -> PC2
* To force traffic through R3, the cost of the direct link R1 -> R2 (Cost-A) must be higher than the alternative path via R3.
* We assign Cost-A = 50 (high cost) to discourage direct routing from R1 -> R2.
* The cost of R1 -> R3 (Cost-C) should be lower, so we assign Cost-C = 20.
* The cost of R3 -> R2 (default Cost-20) remains unchanged.
* Total cost via R3: 20 (R1->R3) + 20 (R3->R2) = 40, which is less than the direct link of 50, so OSPF prefers this path.
# Traffic follows: PC1 -> R1 -> R3 -> R2 -> PC2
2. Traffic from PC2 to PC1 must take the route:
PC2 -> R2 -> R1 -> PC1
* We need to make R2 -> R1 (Cost-B) the best (lowest cost) route for return traffic.
* Assign Cost-B = 10 (low cost).
* This ensures that R2 prefers the direct path R2 -> R1 instead of R2 -> R3 -> R1 (which costs
20+20=40).
# Traffic follows: PC2 -> R2 -> R1 -> PC1
Final Cost Assignments for Correct Routing Behavior:
Cost
Assigned Value
Reason
Cost-A (R1 -> R2)
50
High to discourage direct R1->R2 routing
Cost-B (R2 -> R1)
10
Low to ensure PC2->PC1 prefers direct R2->R1
Cost-C (R1 -> R3)
20
Medium to encourage R1->R3->R2 path
Key Takeaways:
* Higher OSPF cost discourages path selection.
* Lower OSPF cost encourages path selection.
* By manipulating OSPF cost values, we achieve asymmetric routing between PC1 and PC2.
* This aligns with OSPF path selection principles covered in HCIP-Datacom certification.
HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology References:
* Huawei HCIP-Datacom Official Certification Guide, Chapter on OSPF Cost Calculation and Path Selection.
* Huawei Enterprise Networking Training Materials, OSPF Path Optimization Techniques.
* Huawei Datacom Configuration Guide, OSPF Cost and Traffic Engineering.

3
Explanation:
To determine the correct answer, we need to analyze how OSPFv3 handles Router LSAs (Type 1 LSAs) in a simple Area 0 topology like the one shown in the figure.
1. Understanding OSPFv3 Router LSAs (Type 1 LSAs)
* Router LSAs (Type 1 LSAs) are generated by each router within an OSPF area to describe its own directly connected links.
* Each router in an OSPF area generates exactly one Type 1 LSA.
* The Link-State Database (LSDB) on a router contains LSAs from all routers in the same area.
2. Analyzing the Network in the Figure
* There are 3 routers: R1, R2, and R3.
* All routers are in OSPFv3 Area 0 (which is a single area).
* Each of these routers generates one Router LSA (Type 1 LSA).
* Since R2 is in the same area as R1 and R3, its LSDB contains the Router LSAs from itself, R1, and R3.
3. Conclusion
* The LSDB of R2 contains 3 Router LSAs (one from each router: R1, R2, and R3).
* Final Answer: 3

解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)

解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)

解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)