L5M5試験無料問題集「CIPS Managing Ethical Procurement and Supply (L5M5) 認定」
Several UK-based companies operate in diverse production industries, each facing unique market structures and supplier dynamics when sourcing raw materials and negotiating contracts. The power balance between buyers and suppliers varies based on market conditions, supplier availability, and industry-specific factors.
Case A: GreenPasture Feeds Ltd
GreenPasture Feeds Ltd is one of many manufacturers producing cattle feed, with soybean meal as a key ingredient. However, the supply of soybean meal is controlled by a small number of vendors, giving them significant bargaining power. As a result, GreenPasture Feeds Ltd faces higher procurement costs due to supplier dominance in the market.
Case B: MedTech Biologics Ltd
MedTech Biologics Ltd develops a specialized vaccine that relies on a crucial active ingredient supplied by a single biotechnology firm in Germany. This exclusive dependency creates a strategic interdependence between MedTech Biologics Ltd and its sole supplier, requiring close collaboration to maintain an uninterrupted supply chain.
Case C: PlayMax Toy Manufacturing
PlayMax Toy Manufacturing produces plastic toys using a specialized food-grade plastic sourced from a few manufacturers. However, the plastic resin needed for production is widely available from numerous global suppliers. This abundance of supply options strengthens PlayMax's bargaining position, allowing the company to negotiate favorable procurement terms.
Case D: BrewMaster Coffee Company
BrewMaster Coffee Company specializes in premium instant coffee production. Since high-quality Arabica coffee beans are grown and supplied by producers across various regions worldwide, the company benefits from an extensive supplier base. This widespread availability gives BrewMaster a competitive edge in securing cost-effective and high-quality raw materials.
Using the provided options, complete the table by identifying the market structure for each case and determining the buyer-supplier power dynamic based on their level of dominance.

Case A: GreenPasture Feeds Ltd
GreenPasture Feeds Ltd is one of many manufacturers producing cattle feed, with soybean meal as a key ingredient. However, the supply of soybean meal is controlled by a small number of vendors, giving them significant bargaining power. As a result, GreenPasture Feeds Ltd faces higher procurement costs due to supplier dominance in the market.
Case B: MedTech Biologics Ltd
MedTech Biologics Ltd develops a specialized vaccine that relies on a crucial active ingredient supplied by a single biotechnology firm in Germany. This exclusive dependency creates a strategic interdependence between MedTech Biologics Ltd and its sole supplier, requiring close collaboration to maintain an uninterrupted supply chain.
Case C: PlayMax Toy Manufacturing
PlayMax Toy Manufacturing produces plastic toys using a specialized food-grade plastic sourced from a few manufacturers. However, the plastic resin needed for production is widely available from numerous global suppliers. This abundance of supply options strengthens PlayMax's bargaining position, allowing the company to negotiate favorable procurement terms.
Case D: BrewMaster Coffee Company
BrewMaster Coffee Company specializes in premium instant coffee production. Since high-quality Arabica coffee beans are grown and supplied by producers across various regions worldwide, the company benefits from an extensive supplier base. This widespread availability gives BrewMaster a competitive edge in securing cost-effective and high-quality raw materials.
Using the provided options, complete the table by identifying the market structure for each case and determining the buyer-supplier power dynamic based on their level of dominance.

正解:A,B
解答を投票する
解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)
As a procurement manager, you are evaluating the ethical sourcing practices of a company dedicated to improving labor standards across its supply chain. Your task is to match each labor code or standard with the most appropriate supplier relationship model that aligns with its principles.
Company 1: A multinational food corporation collaborates closely with a cocoa supplier in West Africa to establish a transparent supply chain. The company actively supports farmers in adopting sustainable agricultural practices, ensures fair wages, and is deeply committed to eradicating child labor. Their partnership is based on long-term engagement, working together to implement economic empowerment initiatives that benefit both the suppliers and the broader community.
Company 2: A global corporation sources raw materials from multiple international suppliers, ensuring compliance with ILO labor standards through audit reports and annual inspections. The company takes a compliance-driven approach, holding suppliers contractually accountable for adhering to regulations on fair wages, working conditions, and labor rights.
Company 3: A leading apparel brand outsources garment production to factories across several countries. The company has established a voluntary sustainability framework, encouraging suppliers to comply with environmental, human rights, labor, and anti-corruption standards. While participation is not legally binding, suppliers are expected to demonstrate a commitment to ethical and responsible business practices.
Company 4: A cost-driven enterprise prioritizes low-cost procurement, selecting suppliers based on price competitiveness. The company imposes strict penalties on suppliers that fail to meet contractual obligations regarding working hours, wages, and labor conditions, but does not engage with them beyond performance monitoring and enforcement. There is no collaborative effort to improve ethical sourcing or labor standards.
Now, match each company's approach with the most suitable supplier relationship spectrum, identifying how each aligns with global labor codes and ethical sourcing frameworks.

Company 1: A multinational food corporation collaborates closely with a cocoa supplier in West Africa to establish a transparent supply chain. The company actively supports farmers in adopting sustainable agricultural practices, ensures fair wages, and is deeply committed to eradicating child labor. Their partnership is based on long-term engagement, working together to implement economic empowerment initiatives that benefit both the suppliers and the broader community.
Company 2: A global corporation sources raw materials from multiple international suppliers, ensuring compliance with ILO labor standards through audit reports and annual inspections. The company takes a compliance-driven approach, holding suppliers contractually accountable for adhering to regulations on fair wages, working conditions, and labor rights.
Company 3: A leading apparel brand outsources garment production to factories across several countries. The company has established a voluntary sustainability framework, encouraging suppliers to comply with environmental, human rights, labor, and anti-corruption standards. While participation is not legally binding, suppliers are expected to demonstrate a commitment to ethical and responsible business practices.
Company 4: A cost-driven enterprise prioritizes low-cost procurement, selecting suppliers based on price competitiveness. The company imposes strict penalties on suppliers that fail to meet contractual obligations regarding working hours, wages, and labor conditions, but does not engage with them beyond performance monitoring and enforcement. There is no collaborative effort to improve ethical sourcing or labor standards.
Now, match each company's approach with the most suitable supplier relationship spectrum, identifying how each aligns with global labor codes and ethical sourcing frameworks.

正解:A,B
解答を投票する
解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)
As a procurement manager with a focus on sustainability, your objective is to develop KPIs that assess the environmental impact of your suppliers and demonstrate their commitment to eco-friendly practices. What key performance indicators would be most effective in measuring these impacts?
正解:A
解答を投票する
解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)
XYZ Corp is seeking industry certification and has hired an external firm to assess its compliance with regulatory requirements and industry standards. The firm will provide an unbiased evaluation and recommend improvements. What type of audit is XYZ Corp conducting?
正解:C
解答を投票する
解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)
A multinational engineering firm operates across multiple countries and has publicly committed to diversity and inclusion. However, an independent audit uncovers systemic issues:
1. Women with equal qualifications as men are consistently paid less for similar roles across all branches.
2. In the firm's regional office in Country X, minority ethnic applicants are frequently rejected for managerial roles without valid justification.
3. Employees with disabilities in Country Y are disproportionately placed in lower-growth roles, despite having skills for higher positions.
When questioned, leadership attributes these disparities to "cultural differences" and "regional norms." Which key labor rights issue does this scenario illustrate, and what actions should the company prioritize?
1. Women with equal qualifications as men are consistently paid less for similar roles across all branches.
2. In the firm's regional office in Country X, minority ethnic applicants are frequently rejected for managerial roles without valid justification.
3. Employees with disabilities in Country Y are disproportionately placed in lower-growth roles, despite having skills for higher positions.
When questioned, leadership attributes these disparities to "cultural differences" and "regional norms." Which key labor rights issue does this scenario illustrate, and what actions should the company prioritize?
正解:D
解答を投票する
解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)