300-635試験無料問題集（136題）「Cisco Automating Cisco Data Center Solutions (DCAUTO) 認定」

出題：1

Which two methods can you use to implement in-band management access to a Cisco APIC?
(Choose two.)

A. GUI

B. REST API

C. ZTP

D. FTP

E. POAP

正解：A,B 解答を投票する

出題：2

In an ACI Multi-Site deployment managed by Nexus Dashboard Orchestrator, a stretched Bridge Domain has "L2 Stretch" enabled but BUM (Broadcast, Unknown-unicast, Multicast) traffic flooding across sites is undesired for optimization purposes. Which setting should be adjusted?

A. Disable "Intersite BUM Traffic Allow" and rely on head-end replication only within each site, with BD configured for optimized forwarding (e.g., ARP flooding disabled, unicast routing enabled)

B. Remove the Bridge Domain from the stretched Application Profile entirely

C. Change the VRF's enforcement mode to Unenforced

D. Enable Proxy ARP on the affected EPGs

正解：A 解答を投票する

解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)

出題：3

Which Cisco UCS PowerTool commands initiate a Cisco UCS Manager connection?

A.

B.

C.

D.

正解：A 解答を投票する

出題：4

A network automation team wants to validate, before deployment, that a set of Jinja2-rendered NX-OS configuration templates produce syntactically valid CLI for multiple device roles (leaf, spine, border-leaf) using different variable files. Which approach best supports this validation at scale in a CI pipeline?

A. Manually paste each rendered template into a console session on a lab switch

B. Only test against production devices during a maintenance window

C. Use a templating/rendering step (e.g., `ansible-playbook --check` with `template` module, or a standalone Jinja2 render script) combined with a syntax-checking tool or virtual/simulated device (e.g., Cisco VIRL/CML, or NX-OS in a container) to validate rendered output before touching production

D. Skip validation since Jinja2 templates cannot produce invalid syntax

正解：C 解答を投票する

解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)

出題：5

The following Python snippet attempts to bulk-create multiple EPGs via the ACI APIC REST API, submitting one EPG object per POST request. After running, only some EPGs were actually created, with no obvious errors surfaced. What is the most likely cause of this "silent partial failure"?
python
for epg in epg_list:
payload = build_epg_payload(epg)
resp = requests.post(url, json=payload, cookies=cookies, verify=False)
# status code and response body are never checked

A. Python `for` loops are inherently unreliable for making network requests

B. The script never checks each response's status code or the error fields in the response body (e.g., an `error` object inside `imdata`); even when APIC rejects a request due to a naming conflict or validation failure, the script has no way to detect it

C. `requests.post` is asynchronous by default, so some requests may not finish before the script exits

D. The APIC REST API does not support calls made in a loop

正解：B 解答を投票する

解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)

出題：6

While reviewing an APIC REST API response for a failed POST request, an engineer sees an HTTP 400 response with a JSON body containing `"totalCount":"1"` and an `imdata` array with an object of class `error`, whose `text` attribute reads something about an invalid property value.
What does this response structure indicate about how APIC reports errors?

A. APIC never returns structured error information; only raw HTTP status codes are meaningful

B. A 400 status code always means the APIC controller is unreachable

C. APIC embeds error details as a managed object of class `error` within the standard `imdata` response envelope, meaning error handling code must parse the response body (not just the HTTP status code) to extract a human-readable reason

D. The `totalCount` field only applies to successful GET requests, and its presence here is a bug

正解：C 解答を投票する

解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)

出題：7

Which of the following best describes the typical Kafka-based streaming telemetry integration architecture for Cisco Nexus Dashboard / ACI?

A. Kafka can only collect syslog from standalone NX-OS devices, not ACI

B. ACI Fabric integrates via gRPC/Kafka, pushing events/health scores etc. as a stream to external big-data/SIEM platforms (e.g., via a Kafka Exporter feature in Nexus Dashboard or an external Kafka cluster) for consumption

C. APIC itself acts as a Kafka Broker, and third-party systems connect directly to APIC to consume telemetry

D. Kafka integration requires configuring a separate Kafka Producer on every leaf switch

正解：B 解答を投票する

解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)

出題：8

A team wants their Ansible automation to work seamlessly whether the target device is running NX-OS in standalone mode or is part of an ACI fabric in NX-OS mode (not APIC-managed), abstracting away CLI differences where possible. Which Ansible concept helps achieve this device-agnostic automation design?

A. Hardcoding a single CLI command list that is assumed to work identically on every Cisco platform

B. Avoiding Ansible altogether for any platform-dependent task

C. Using `ansible_network_os` combined with platform-appropriate Ansible collections/roles, and structuring playbooks/roles to branch or select modules based on the detected/declared platform, maximizing reuse of common logic

D. Writing completely separate, unrelated playbooks for every possible platform with no shared logic

正解：C 解答を投票する

解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)

出題：9

Drag and Drop Question
After a Cisco Nexus switch interface is enabled and in the up state, an engineer must automate the configuration of the interface descriptions using the EEM Python Module.
Drag and drop the steps the engineer must take from the left into the correct order on the right.

正解：

Explanation:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/datamodels/configuration/xe-16/data-models-xe-16-book/python-scripting-for-eem.html

300-635試験無料問題集「Cisco Automating Cisco Data Center Solutions (DCAUTO) 認定」