試験3V0-21.25 トピック1 問題67 スレッド

The primary architectural risk in any single-zone deployment within VCF 9.0 is the existence of a shared failure domain. In a single-zone Supervisor cluster or workload domain, all components-including the web, application, and database tiers-reside within the same logical and often physical infrastructure boundary (such as a single rack or data center room). If the underlying zone experiences a critical failure, such as a localized power outage, cooling failure, or a total top-of-rack switch collapse, the entire 3-tier application stack will go offline simultaneously. For mission-critical applications requiring high availability, VCF 9.0 recommends a multi-zone or stretched cluster architecture. In such designs, the failure of one zone does not compromise the entire application because the tiers can be distributed across different fault domains, ensuring that the stateless web tier and stateful database remain operational elsewhere. In the context of the 99.9% uptime requirement mentioned, a single-zone design represents a significant risk because it lacks the redundancy needed to survive zone-level disruptions.