AB-731試験無料問題集「Microsoft AI Transformation Leader 認定」

Your company plans to use generative AI to help build a website that will showcase various existing products.
Which capability best describes a benefit of using generative AI for this project? Select the BEST answer.

解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)
Your company plans to build a generative AI solution based on internal data. You recommend using Microsoft Foundry as a starting point to develop and manage the solution. What is a key benefit of using Microsoft Foundry for this project?

解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)
Your company is evaluating the use of Microsoft Copilot Studio to support business process automation and employee self-service. Which two capabilities are directly supported in Copilot Studio? Each correct answer presents a complete solution. NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)
Your company is developing an AI-powered customer support agent. You need to ensure that the solution follows Microsoft responsible AI principles. Which two actions should you perform? Select the two BEST answers. Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)
Your company plans to use an AI-powered solution to analyze customer feedback for insights related to future product designs. You need to mitigate the privacy risks associated with the solution. What is the best approach to achieve the goal? Select the BEST answer.

解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)
For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true. Otherwise, select No. NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
正解:

Explanation:
Answer Area
* Microsoft Foundry provides a unified platform for developers and data professionals to create custom end-to-end AI solutions. Answer: Yes
* Microsoft Foundry provides a unified platform for low-code developers and business users to create custom end-to-end AI solutions. Answer: No
* You need a Microsoft 365 Copilot license to access Microsoft Foundry services. Answer: No
* Yes - Microsoft Foundry is positioned by Microsoft as a unified AI platform for building, deploying, and scaling AI apps and agents, with enterprise governance in a single environment. Microsoft explicitly describes Foundry as enabling developers (and, in broader descriptions, data professionals
/enterprises) to build and operate AI solutions end-to-end, which aligns with the statement.
* No - While Foundry can streamline AI development workflows and may include experiences that reduce complexity, the statement specifically targets low-code developers and business users creating custom end-to-end AI solutions. In Microsoft's ecosystem, that "low-code/business-user" agent/app- building lane is more directly associated with tools like Copilot Studio/Power Platform , whereas Foundry is primarily presented as the platform for developers and technical teams building and governing AI solutions. Therefore, as written, the statement is not the best characterization.
* No - Access to Microsoft Foundry services is not gated by a Microsoft 365 Copilot license. Foundry is part of the Azure AI platform experience (formerly Azure AI Studio) and is accessed through Azure, using Azure subscription-based service consumption. Microsoft 365 Copilot licensing is for Microsoft
365 Copilot experiences, not a prerequisite to use Foundry services.
You have a business unit that uses an AI solution to process loan applications. You discover that the solution rejects the application of all applicants that are older than 60 years of age. Which Microsoft responsible AI principle is this violating?

解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)
For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true. Otherwise, select No. NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
正解:

Explanation:
Answer Area
* Allowing AI models to make autonomous decisions supports the Microsoft responsible AI principle of accountability. Answer: No
* Regularly testing AI models for fairness and inclusiveness helps ensure they align with Microsoft's Responsible AI principles. Answer: Yes
* Protecting user data and limiting access to personal information supports the Microsoft responsible AI principles of privacy and security. Answer: Yes Microsoft's Responsible AI principles emphasize that people and organizations must remain accountable for AI systems and their outcomes. Accountability is strengthened by governance, human oversight, clear ownership, auditability, and processes to review and address issues-not by letting models make unchecked autonomous decisions. Therefore, statement 1 is No : increasing autonomy can actually increase risk unless paired with human-in-the-loop controls and clear escalation paths, because accountability requires clear responsibility for decisions and impacts.
Statement 2 is Yes because fairness and inclusiveness are explicitly supported through ongoing evaluation.
Regular testing helps detect disparate impact, performance gaps across user groups, and unintended bias introduced by data drift or changes in usage patterns. It's not a one-time activity; it's continuous assurance that the system behaves appropriately as conditions change.
Statement 3 is Yes because privacy and security are directly supported by protecting personal/sensitive data, enforcing least privilege access, and implementing controls such as data loss prevention, encryption, access logging, and strong identity governance. Limiting access to personal information reduces exposure and supports compliance obligations while aligning with privacy-by-design and secure-by-design expectations for AI-enabled solutions.